Post by arfanho7 on Feb 28, 2024 13:21:35 GMT 3
So it was a shock to many when in the venerable institution announced it would no longer publish a print version of its multivolume compendium of knowledge. Though the Britannica would still be available online the writing on the virtual wall was clear It had been supplanted by the Internet. And more specifically by an upstart phenomenon Wikipedia the free crowd sourced encyclopedia that since its inception in had rapidly become the new go to source for knowledge.
“MOST OF THE TOPICS OF CONTENT WE ARE DEALING WITH ON A DAILY BASIS DO NOT HAVE A VERIFIABLE ANSWER” It s sad to see the trajectory of Encyclopædia Britannica says Feng Zhu an assistant professor in the Technology and Operations Management unit at Harvard Business School who details Indonesia Mobile Number List the rise and fall of the information giant in a new working paper. There has been lots of research on the accuracy of Wikipedia and the results are mixed—some studies show it is just as good as the experts others show that Wikipedia is not accurate at all. Complicating matters however many of the topics that we look up in the Britannica—any encyclopedia—aren t factually cut and dried.
Most of the topics of content we are dealing with on a daily basis do not have a verifiable answer says Zhu.controversial. History they say is written by the victors and can read very differently depending on who is telling the tale. Even modern day issues such as immigration gun control abortion and foreign policy are open to fervent debate depending on who is doing the opining. Over the years Britannica has handled this uncertainty by seeking out the most distinguished experts in their fields in an attempt to provide a sober analysis on topics while Wikipedia has urged its civilian editors to maintain what it calls a neutral point of view NPOV.
“MOST OF THE TOPICS OF CONTENT WE ARE DEALING WITH ON A DAILY BASIS DO NOT HAVE A VERIFIABLE ANSWER” It s sad to see the trajectory of Encyclopædia Britannica says Feng Zhu an assistant professor in the Technology and Operations Management unit at Harvard Business School who details Indonesia Mobile Number List the rise and fall of the information giant in a new working paper. There has been lots of research on the accuracy of Wikipedia and the results are mixed—some studies show it is just as good as the experts others show that Wikipedia is not accurate at all. Complicating matters however many of the topics that we look up in the Britannica—any encyclopedia—aren t factually cut and dried.
Most of the topics of content we are dealing with on a daily basis do not have a verifiable answer says Zhu.controversial. History they say is written by the victors and can read very differently depending on who is telling the tale. Even modern day issues such as immigration gun control abortion and foreign policy are open to fervent debate depending on who is doing the opining. Over the years Britannica has handled this uncertainty by seeking out the most distinguished experts in their fields in an attempt to provide a sober analysis on topics while Wikipedia has urged its civilian editors to maintain what it calls a neutral point of view NPOV.